TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| VOLUME 1: Keynote Lectures, Regional Reports & Session Reports |
| PAPER NUMBER |
PAPER TITLE |
AUTHOR/S |
| KN 1 |
Influence of test equipment and procedures on obtained accuracy in CPTU |
R. Sandven |
| KN 2 |
Interpretation of the CPT in Engineering Practice |
K. Been, A. Quiñonez & R.B. Sancio |
| KN 3 |
Some issues related to applications of the CPT |
N. Ramsey |
| KN 4 |
The CPT in offshore soil investigations - a historic perspective |
T. Lunne |
| RR 1 |
Regional Report for Northern Europe |
M. Long |
| RR 2 |
Regional Report for Southern Europe |
A. Viana da Fonseca |
| RR 3 |
Regional Report for East European Countries |
Z. Młynarek |
| RR 4 |
Regional Report for the Nordic Countries |
H. Lofroth, R. Sandven, C. Bonde, H. Halkola |
| RR 5 |
Regional Report for the Middle East and Africa |
T. M. Elkteb |
| RR 6 |
Regional Report for Asia |
A.B. Huang |
| RR 7 |
Regional Report for Australia & New Zealand |
M. Fahey & B. L. Lehane |
| RR 8 |
Regional Report for North America |
P.W. Mayne |
| RR 9 |
Regional Report for South America |
R. Q. Coutinho & F. Schnaid |
| SR 1 |
Session Report 1: CPT Equipment & Procedures |
J.J.M. Powell |
| SR 2 |
Session Report 2: CPT Interpretation |
J. A. Schneider |
| SR 3 |
Session Report 3: CPT Applications |
F. Schnaid |
Technical Papers |
| Volume 2: Equipment and Procedures |
| PAPER NUMBER |
PAPER TITLE |
AUTHOR/S |
| 1-01 |
A comparative study of International CPTU and China Double bridge CPT tests |
S.Y. Liu, G.J. Cai, L.Y. Tong and G.Y. Du, Anand J. Puppala |
| 1-02 |
Safely uncovering deep foundations and services with magnetometer cone |
S. N. Elgun, C.A.H.M. van Isselt & R. Jansch |
| 1-03 |
Estimation of u1/u2 conversion factor for piezocone |
J. Peuchen, J.F. Vanden Berghe & C. Coulais |
| 1-04 |
A Cone Permeameter for determining hydraulic conductivity in unsaturated soils |
Y. Homma, T. Ishida and T. Shimotashiro |
| 1-05 |
CPT in polar snow - equipment and procedures |
A.B. McCallum, A. Barwise & R. Santos |
| 1-06 |
Influence of rate of penetration on CPT tip resistance in standard CPT and in CPTWD (CPT while drilling) |
M. Sacchetto & A. Trevisan |
| 1-07 |
Real-time temperature compensation technique on the CPT using FBG sensor |
R. H. Kim, J. S. Lee, S. W. An, K. D. Bae & W. J. Lee |
| 1-08 |
A pilot study of in-hole type CPTu using piezoelectric bender elements |
I.S. Jang & O.S. Kwon, C. K. Chung |
| 1-09 |
Development of an electrical resistivity measure for geotechnical and geoenvironmental characterization |
A. S. P. Peixoto, M. C. Pregnolato & A. C. C. L. Silva, M. T. Yamasaki, F. Conte Junior |
| 1-10 |
Influence factors study of cone loading test in the centrifuge |
H.Ali & Ph.Reiffsteck, L.Thorel, C.Gaudin |
| 1-11 |
A new Hydraulic profiling tool including CPT measurements |
Ph.Reiffsteck, B. Dorbani, E. Haza-Rozier, J.-J. Fry |
| 1-12 |
Field application of continuous intrusion miniature CPT system in South Korea |
S. Yoon, M.T. Tumay |
| 1-13 |
Experience with lightweight pushing equipment and CPT in Lithuania |
S. Anilionis |
| 1-14 |
The applicability of soil density measurements using a resistivity probe |
J. Dijkstra, W. Broere |
| 1-15 |
Field experience of the piezoball in soft clay |
C. Colreavy & C.D. O’Loughlin, M. Long, N. Boylan, D. Ward |
| 1-16 |
A combined up the hole Drilling/CPT equipment for near-shore site investigation |
N. Pérez García, M.J. Devincenzi |
| 1-17 |
CPT for soft sediments and deepwater investigations |
R. Boggess & P.K. Robertson |
| Volume 2: Interpretation |
| PAPER NUMBER |
PAPER TITLE |
AUTHOR/S |
| 2-01 |
Application of piezocone to evaluate consolidation and permeability properties of Taihu lacustrine clay deposits |
G.J. Cai, S.Y. Liu, L.Y. Tong and G.Y. Du, Anand J. Puppala |
| 2-02 |
CPT data in relation to a general model for the undrained behaviour of homogeneous Swedish clays |
Rolf Larsson, Helen Åhnberg and Hjördis Löfroth |
| 2-03 |
Penetration rate effects on cone resistance measured in a calibration chamber |
K. Kim, M. Prezzi & R. Salgado, W. Lee |
| 2-04 |
Correlations between CPT and PMT at a Dynamic Compaction Project |
B. Hamidi & H. Nikraz, S. Varaksin |
| 2-05 |
Soil unit weight estimation from CPTs |
P.W. Mayne, J. Peuchen and D. Bouwmeester |
| 2-06 |
Spatial characterization of Vs at Amherst NGES site from SCPT using Bayesian kriging |
M. Uzielli, J. Facciorusso, P.W. Mayne |
| 2-07 |
Basic soil properties from CPT in Bangkok clay for highway design |
J. Sunitsakul, A. Sawatparnich & S. Apimeteetamrong |
| 2-08 |
Cone resistance profiles for laboratory tests in sand |
M. Senders |
| 2-09 |
TCPT in permafrost: penetrometer - soil thermophysical interaction |
O.N. Isaev, I.B. Ryzhkov |
| 2-10 |
Evaluation of cementation effect of sand using cone resistance |
M. J. Lee, Y. M. Choi, M. T. Kim, & W. J. Lee |
| 2-11 |
Virtual Calibration Chamber CPT on Ticino sand |
J. Butlanska, M. Arroyo & A. Gens |
| 2-12 |
Evaluation of undrained shear strength of soft New Orleans clay using piezocone |
L. Wei & R. Pant, M.T. Tumay |
| 2-13 |
CPT-SPT correlations for calcareous sand in the Persian Gulf Area |
T.M. Elkateb, H.E. Ali |
| 2-14 |
K0 determination of Sand Using CPT Calibration Chamber |
M.M. Ahmadi & P. Karambakhsh |
| 2-15 |
Experimental estimation of distribution of excess pore pressure by cone penetration |
T.G. Ha, J.Y. Kim, J.H.Kim and C.K. Chung |
| 2-16 |
Interpretation of CPTU and SDMT in organic, Irish soils |
A. Bihs, M. Long, D. Marchetti, D. Ward |
| 2-17 |
Influence of the stress conditions on the piezocone shear strength – results from a model test study |
Hjördis Löfroth |
| 2-18 |
Correlation between CPT and SPT in Adapazari, Turkey |
O. Kara, Z. Gündüz |
| 2-19 |
Evaluation of piezocone characterization in deltaic deposits |
B. Kavur, M. Mulabdic & K. Minazek |
| 2-20 |
Resistivity on marine sediments retrieved from RCPTU-soundings:
a Norwegian case study |
M. Rømoen, A. A. Pfaffhuber & K. Karlsrud, T.E. Helle |
| 2-21 |
CPT interpretation in marine soils less than 5m depth – examples from the North Sea |
R. Mitchell, S. Wootton & R. Comrie |
| 2-22 |
Comparison of cone and minicone penetration resistance for sand at shallow depth |
M.R. Tufenkjian, E. Yee, D.J. Thompson |
| 2-23 |
Evaluation of undrained shear strength of Busan clay using CPT |
S. J. Hong, M. J. Lee, J. J. Kim & W. J. Lee |
| 2-24 |
The engineering properties of surface layer on very soft clay of the south coast in Korea |
H.S. Jung & C.G. Cho & B.S. Chun |
| 2-25 |
CPT in unsaturated soils using a new calibration chamber |
M. Pournaghiazar, A.R. Russell & N. Khalili |
| 2-26 |
Bias reduction on CPT-based correlations |
T. van der Wal, S. Goedemoed & J. Peuchen |
| 2-27 |
CPT and other Direct Push methods |
T. Vienken, C. Leven, P. Dietrich |
| 2-28 |
Evaluation of cone penetration test data from a calcareous dune sand |
J.A. Schneider, B.M. Lehane |
| 2-29 |
Prediction of shear wave velocity for offshore sands using CPT data – Adriatic sea |
L. Paoletti, Y. Hegazy, S. Monaco, R. Piva |
| 2-30 |
Strength evaluation of soft marine deposits in Atlantic Coastal Plain using in-situ testing methods |
P. E. Cargill, W. M. Camp, III |
| 2-31 |
Novel methodologies for soil characterization from CPT data |
P.U. Kurup, E.P. Griffin, M.T. Tumay |
| 2-32 |
Prediction of soil properties from PCPT data using model trees |
P.U. Kurup, E.P. Griffin |
| 2-33 |
CPT experience in glacial geological conditions of Minnesota, USA |
D. D. Dasenbrock, J.A. Schneider & E.M. Mergen |
| 2-34 |
CPTU site investigation and stockpile performance evaluation |
A. Sotil, S. Spraggett & G. Barreda, M. Skurski |
| 2-35 |
A site-specific fines content correlation using cone penetration test data |
M.D. Boone, M.J. Freitas |
| 2-36 |
Interpreting CPT results in unsaturated sands |
A. R. Russell, M. Pournaghiazar & N. Khalili |
| 2-37 |
Correlation of cone resistance and shear wave velocity for residual soil |
Widjojo A. Prakoso |
| 2-38 |
Interpretation of the in situ density from seismic CPT in Fraser River sand |
M. Ghafghazi, D. A. Shuttle |
| 2-39 |
Finite element modeling of cone penetration in sand |
N. S. Kumar, V. Kumar, A. Deb & D. Roy |
| 2-40 |
Estimating soil unit weight from CPT |
P.K. Robertson and K.L. Cabal |
| 2-41 |
CPTU, DMT, SDMT results for organic and fluvial soils |
Z. Młynarek, J. Wierzbicki, K. Stefaniak |
| 2-42 |
CPTU interpretation for stratigraphic logging: differences between sedimentary and residual soils |
G. De Mio, H. L. Giacheti, A. Viana da Fonseca & C. Ferreira |
| 2-43 |
Estimating in-situ state parameter and friction angle in sandy soils from CPT |
P.K. Robertson |
| 2-44 |
Use of CPT and CPTu for soil profiling of “intermediate” soils: a new approach |
D. Lo Presti & N. Squeglia, C. Meisina & L. Visconti |
| 2-45 |
Comparison of soil modeling using CPT and DMT- a case study |
K. Aykın, Ö. Akçakal, H.T. Durgunoğlu, |
| 2-46 |
Geotechnical parameters of very soft clays from CPTu |
M.S.S. de Almeida, M.E.S. Marques, M. Baroni |
| 2-47 |
Soil profiling by CPTu in soft, sensitive soils of Urmiyeh Lake in Iran |
A. Eslami, B. Hosseini, M. Eslami |
| 2-48 |
Modeling ROST and CPT Data to estimate LNAPL saturation |
B. D. Smith & J. Gleason |
| 2-49 |
Cone penetration tests at active earthquake sites |
F.A. Trevor, J.M. Paisley, P.W. Mayne |
| 2-50 |
Variable penetration rate CPT in an intermediate soil |
R.A. Jaeger, J.T. DeJong, R.W. Boulanger, H.E. Low, M.F. Randolph |
| 2-51 |
Estimating in-situ soil permeability from CPT & CPTu |
P.K. Robertson |
| 2-52 |
Evaluation of the CPT for assessing ground improvement by dynamic replacement |
L.J. Bates & R.S. Merifield |
| 2-53 |
Comparison of CPT- and DMT-correlated effective friction angle in clayey and silty sands |
G. McNulty, M.D. Harney |
| 2-54 |
Two examples of CPT interpretation to define geotechnical profile |
T.Mateos |
| 2-55 |
Classification, overconsolidation and stiffness of Venice lagoon soils from CPTU |
L. Tonni & G. Gottardi, V. Berengo & P. Simonini |
| 2-56 |
Soil behaviour type from the CPT: an update |
P.K. Robertson |
| Volume 3: Applications |
| PAPER NUMBER |
PAPER TITLE |
AUTHOR/S |
| 3-01 |
Settlement Estimation of Multiple Footings in Sands |
J. Lee, J. Eun, M. Prezzi & R. Salgado |
| 3-02 |
Case history of axial pile capacity and load-settlement response by SCPTu |
F.S. Niazi & P.W. Mayne, D.J. Woeller |
| 3-03 |
Case study of CPT application to evaluate seismic settlement in dry sand |
F. Yi |
| 3-04 |
Using CPTU to control dynamic compaction of hydraulic fill |
A. T. Ozer, C. W. Christmann, & L. G. Bromwell |
| 3-05 |
Statistical review of CPT data and implications for pile design |
P. Doherty & K. Gavin |
| 3-06 |
Use of the High Resolution Piezocone for Geoenvironmental Applications |
M. Kram, T. D. Dalzell, P. Ljunggren |
| 3-07 |
CPTU for consolidation properties of Lake Bonneville clay |
A. T. Ozer, S. F. Bartlett & E. C. Lawton |
| 3-08 |
Application of CPT for adequate selection of pile driving techniques |
I.B. Ryzhkov, O.N. Isaev |
| 3-09 |
Use of mini CPT to evaluate degree of compaction in fine-grained soils |
N. Squeglia & D. C. F. Lo Presti |
| 3-10 |
Assessment of LCPC CPT method for bored piles in Brasilia clay |
R.P. Cunha, W.P. Stewart |
| 3-11 |
CPT in glacial soils after deep excavation |
T. Liao & K.R. Bell, H. Senapathy |
| 3-12 |
Characterization of postglacial clay for the design of building foundations |
W. Steiner |
| 3-13 |
Pile Capacity Prediction using CPT - Case History |
G. Togliani |
| 3-14 |
Uncertainty-Based Optimization of Site Characterization Using CPT |
I.T. Ng, C.Y. Zhou |
| 3-15 |
Spatial Variability of Levees as Measured Using the CPT |
R.E.S. Moss, J. C. Hollenback, J. Ng |
| 3-16 |
CPTU characteristics and liquefaction resistance of reclaimed land by dynamic compaction |
C.S. Ku, C.H. Juang |
| 3-17 |
A tool in groundwater remediation |
S. J. Osborne |
| 3-18 |
End bearing formulation for CPT based driven pile design methods in siliceous sands |
J.A. Schneider, X. Xu, B.M. Lehane |
| 3-19 |
CPT-based assessment of liquefaction-induced foundation soil deformations |
B. Unutmaz, H. T. Bilge, K. O. Cetin |
| 3-20 |
CPT-based ultimate capacity of driven piles in residual soil |
W. A. Prakoso & S.P. Hadiwardoyo |
| 3-21 |
Verification of a deep soil-bentonite barrier wall using the CPTu |
S. R. Jones, G. Taylor |
| 3-22 |
Comparing CPT and DPSH in Lithuanian soils |
S. Gadeikis & G. Žaržojus, D. Urbaitis |
| 3-23 |
Misclassification in CPT liquefaction evaluation |
J. W. Pease |
| 3-24 |
Settlement of pile using cone loading test: load settlement curve approach |
H.Ali & Ph.Reiffsteck, F.Baguelin, H.van de Graaf, C. Bacconnet & R.Gourvès |
| 3-25 |
Pile capacity prediction in Minnesota soils using direct CPT and CPTu methods |
G.R. Reuter |
| 3-26 |
Use of multiple induced fluorescence tools at a pipeline site to characterize residual LNAPL |
K. R. Patton, S. M. Kuhlman |
| 3-27 |
SCPT for design of shallow bridge foundations in Minnesota |
J.G. Bentler & M.J.L. Hoppe |
| 3-28 |
CPT-based evaluation of liquefaction potential for fine-grained soils |
M. Pehlivan, H. T. Bilge, K. O. Cetin |
| 3-29 |
Post earthquake shear strengths of clay by CPT and vane testing methods at Scoggins Dam |
J.A. Farrar |
| 3-30 |
Evaluation of liquefaction risk by a revised LPI approach |
A. Özocak & S. Sert |
| 3-31 |
Drainage characterization of tailings from in situ test |
F. Schnaid, J. Bedin, L.M. Costa Filho |
| 3-32 |
Diagnosing liquefaction potential by the dissipation test in fine grained soil |
E. Bol, A. Önalp, E. Arel |
| 3-33 |
Hydrostratigraphic and permeability profiling for groundwater remediation projects |
J.A. Quinnan, N.R.H. Welty, E. Killenbeck |
| 3-34 |
Forensic evaluation of an embankment on soft ground using CPT |
W. M. Camp, III, & A. D. Goldberg, D. L. Bellamy |
| 3-35 |
Identification of consolidation conditions of copper ore post-flotation sediments in tailings |
W. Tschuschke |
| 3-36 |
Assessment of strength parameters of copper ore post-flotation deposit based on CPTU |
W. Tschuschke |
| 3-37 |
Using CPT to refine subsurface characterization for a subway project |
H. Yang, A. Tang, M. Fong, and T. Lee |
| 3-38 |
Evaluation of liquefaction resistance of non-plastic silt from mini-cone calibration chamber tests |
C.D.P. Baxter, M.S. Ravi Sharma, N.V. Seher, & M. Jander |
| 3-39 |
Derivation of CFA pile capacity in a silty clay soil using CPTu |
K.V. Pardoski |
| 3-40 |
Direct CPT method for footing response in sands using a database approach |
P.W. Mayne and F. Illingworth |
| 3-41 |
Comparing in-situ cone resistance and pile jacking force |
M. Marchi, L. Balbarini & G. Gottardi, L. Zambianchi |
| 3-42 |
Design of cut-and-cover tunnel in quick clay based on CPTU and laboratory tests |
E. Tørum, R. Sandven, S.G. Hovem & S. Rønning |
| 3-43 |
Finite element analysis of the CPT for design of bored piles |
A. Tolooiyan & K. Gavin |
| 3-44 |
Simplified model for evaluating soil liquefaction potential using CPTU |
C.H. Juang, C.S. Ku, C.C. Chen |
| 3-45 |
Instability assessment of Loess using a CPT-based evaluation method |
J.P. Karam, Y.J. Cui, C. Yang, J.M. Terpereau |
| 3-46 |
Evaluating relative compaction of fills using CPT |
G. Agrawal, O. Pekin, D. Chandra |
| 3-47 |
Evaluation of clay behavior in dam core based on CPT |
Z. Skutnik |
| 3-48 |
Use of CPT-UVOST to characterize disparate hydrocarbon plumes in a heterogeneous environment |
C. S. Laber |
| 3-49 |
Investigation and design of a fly ash road embankment in India by CPT |
A.K.Sinha, V. G. Havanagi, S. Mathur & U. K. Guruvittal |
| 3-50 |
Sensitivity of CPT and DMT to stress history and aging in sands for liquefaction assessment |
Silvano Marchetti |
| 3-51 |
Evaluation of strength parameters of Masjed – Soleyman Dam clay core using CPTU |
A. Khalili, F. Jafarzadeh |
| 3-52 |
Pile capacity for Omega piles in an unsaturated Brazilian soil using the CPT |
P.J.R. Albuquerque & D. Carvalho, E. B. Fontaine |
| 3-53 |
Effect of load test interpretation on the resistance factors of driven piles |
H.H. Titi, M.B. Elias |